TPM reports Oops! Republican Asks Scalia About Constitutionality Of Earmarks "'The question of earmarks came up, whether or not the constitutionality of earmarks would be considered constitutional [sic],' Bachmann told reporters after the seminar."
"It's up to Congress how you want to appropriate, basically," Scalia told the members, according to Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX). "He pointed out historically, like when Jefferson was president, [Congress] said here's a big pot of money, you decide where it goes, and Jefferson ended up paying up a big hunk of it to the Barbary Pirates."
Have these people read the constitution? Were they in the room or listening when it was read to them?
1 comment:
Read != comprehend. If they were smart, they wouldn't believe that cutting taxes from already-low levels will magically increase government revenues.
Post a Comment