tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10162381.post7835613975654864509..comments2023-10-29T10:41:21.303-04:00Comments on Castro's Favorite Color: McCain Camp To Propose Postponing VP DebateHowardhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14914637175040341245noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10162381.post-32120614548172109122008-09-25T17:04:00.000-04:002008-09-25T17:04:00.000-04:00I heard such things too. I thought her interview ...I heard such things too. I thought her interview was horrible but most of the Sunday morning commenters said it was a wash. I'm still in disbelief. <BR/><BR/>There's also <A HREF="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/09/debates-may-not-be-decisive-after-all.html" REL="nofollow">this</A> that suggests the debates don't change people's mind too much.<BR/><BR/>I too gag when Bush speaks (I'm sure no shock). His smirk was gone Wed but I think his speak was overly panicy. Also, I couldn't help but wonder if he understood the words he was saying. He stumbled a few times on the telepromter so I'm not sure.Howardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14914637175040341245noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10162381.post-76879817773078696002008-09-25T17:01:00.000-04:002008-09-25T17:01:00.000-04:00One analyst when commenting on the Gibson intervie...One analyst when commenting on the Gibson interview of Palin mentioned that people's response was like a "rorschach test". A positively predisposed viewer liked what they saw and a negatively predisplosed viewer hated what they saw. So the interview doesn't change people's minds. Likewise, this interview probably doesn't change a person's already formed opinion of Palin. <BR/><BR/>Another example: I pretty much gag whenever Bush speaks no matter what he says. Though I must say that in Bush's recent speech on the financial crisis his "smirk" seemed to be gone: it only took six years of war and a financial meltdown.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com